Re: Declarative partitioning

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 20 November 2015 at 09:18, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
> wrote:
>>
>> On 2015/11/06 1:29, Robert Haas wrote:
>> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Amit Langote
>> > <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> >> The DDL and catalogs part are not much different from what I had last
>> >> described though I took a few steps to simplify things. I dropped the
>> >> multi-level partitioning bit
>> >
>> > Hmm, that doesn't sound good to me. I think multi-level partitioning
>> > is a reasonably important use case.
>>
>> I agree. I'm in the process of reformulating this proposal from the
>> syntax, catalog and DDL -centric perspective and will re-incorporate
>> multi-level partitioning notion into it. It was a mistake to drop it.
>
>
> Drop it?? I think he means "in this initial patch", right Amit L ?

Yes, there was some notion of multi-level partitioning in the earlier
patch but I removed it from the version I posted on Oct 30. I do
intend to re-introduce it though.

Thanks,
Amit