| From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: using expression syntax for partition bounds |
| Date: | 2019-01-26 03:14:33 |
| Message-ID: | CA+HiwqEKfB1QRQ89jMZZtCz6-z7+3mqN5K=_T8Yt0kFeWTH4eQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 12:01 Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 03:14:51AM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> > How about replacing \d+ list_parted with couple of \d on individual
> > partitions, like in the attached?
>
> That would make it. Why just part_1 and part_3 though? It looks more
> complete to add part_null and part_2 as well.
The describe lines are there just to show that the stored expessions are
not verbatim same as the input expressions, so it seemed an overkill to add
them for all of the partitions.
Thanks,
Amit
PS: away from a computer, typing on the smartphone
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-01-26 03:23:27 | Re: pg_basebackup, walreceiver and wal_sender_timeout |
| Previous Message | Morris de Oryx | 2019-01-26 03:13:45 | Re: crosstab/repivot...any interest? |