Re: Draft release notes up for review

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Draft release notes up for review
Date: 2015-02-01 02:43:04
Message-ID: CA+HiwqE=FPx4j-TEAAOqEx0YuwyHZiuh=gpTBBcMnguQy+96Zg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Please let me know of any corrections ASAP.
>
> Note that I've been fairly ruthless about removing items altogether if
> they were unlikely to have clear user-visible impact, because the notes
> were eye-glazingly long already. Please mention it if you see any
> remaining items that we could dispense with ... or if you think I
> underestimated the significance of anything that got dropped.
>

Perhaps the following two missed?

http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=deadbf4f3324f7b2826cac60dd212dfa1b0084ec

http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=cd63c57e5cbfc16239aa6837f8b7043a721cdd28

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-02-01 02:57:47 Re: Draft release notes up for review
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-02-01 01:25:03 Re: jsonb, unicode escapes and escaped backslashes