Re: adding partitioned tables to publications

From: Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: adding partitioned tables to publications
Date: 2020-01-07 14:18:27
Message-ID: CA+FpmFfAZ_rs76o1C2-ZuPDYiJ0cOZQ2MqfeWmUpAfhNc5dnSw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 at 06:02, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Rebased and updated to address your comments.
>
+ <para>
+ Partitioned tables are not considered when <literal>FOR ALL TABLES</literal>
+ is specified.
+ </para>
+
What is the reason for above, I mean not for the comment but not
including partitioned tables in for all tables options.

--
Regards,
Rafia Sabih

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2020-01-07 15:59:22 Re: Assert failure due to "drop schema pg_temp_3 cascade" for temporary tables and \d+ is not showing any info after drooping temp table schema
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2020-01-07 13:08:46 Re: reduce size of fmgr_builtins array