| From: | Igor Korot <ikorot01(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Problem linking with Release library |
| Date: | 2026-05-13 04:59:41 |
| Message-ID: | CA+FnnTy4LHWwQyAV4VK+S=2TfbUkVctGh1Dc6YdV2UCY=MU4aQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi, Ron,
On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 8:10 PM Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 10:52 PM Igor Korot <ikorot01(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> [snip]
>
>> I’m not running Postgres server. It is running on the different machines.
>> All I need is to build the client library. Why can’t I? Why it should
>> matter what software (OS/compiler) I’m using? As long as I can successfully
>> build my software and test it it should be fine.
>>
>
> David made it pretty clear: the *PGDG changed the toolchain*,
>
It didn’t change the toolchain - it changed configuration tools. But it’s
not the point.
The point I’m making is that the software was providing the makefile and
now it does not.
Thank you.
and decided *not to support* an OS that went *EOL* three years ago, and a
> compiler that's only getting security updates: "There is no guarantee or
> real attempt to keep modern supported versions running on software
> obsoleted before they even came into existence."
>
> --
> Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
> Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
> <Redacted> lobster!
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Igor Korot | 2026-05-13 06:06:14 | Re: Problem linking with Release library |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2026-05-13 04:52:08 | Re: Problem linking with Release library |