Re: Problem linking with Release library

From: Igor Korot <ikorot01(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Problem linking with Release library
Date: 2026-05-13 04:59:41
Message-ID: CA+FnnTy4LHWwQyAV4VK+S=2TfbUkVctGh1Dc6YdV2UCY=MU4aQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi, Ron,

On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 8:10 PM Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 10:52 PM Igor Korot <ikorot01(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> [snip]
>
>> I’m not running Postgres server. It is running on the different machines.
>> All I need is to build the client library. Why can’t I? Why it should
>> matter what software (OS/compiler) I’m using? As long as I can successfully
>> build my software and test it it should be fine.
>>
>
> David made it pretty clear: the *PGDG changed the toolchain*,
>

It didn’t change the toolchain - it changed configuration tools. But it’s
not the point.

The point I’m making is that the software was providing the makefile and
now it does not.

Thank you.

and decided *not to support* an OS that went *EOL* three years ago, and a
> compiler that's only getting security updates: "There is no guarantee or
> real attempt to keep modern supported versions running on software
> obsoleted before they even came into existence."
>
> --
> Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
> Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
> <Redacted> lobster!
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Igor Korot 2026-05-13 06:06:14 Re: Problem linking with Release library
Previous Message Tom Lane 2026-05-13 04:52:08 Re: Problem linking with Release library