Re: [Minor] Duplicated word in "Creating a Database" tutorial

From: Matemática A3K <matematica(dot)a3k(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Minor] Duplicated word in "Creating a Database" tutorial
Date: 2026-09-25 18:48:57
Message-ID: CA+FDnhLPKnyBX1-hABigaL6tDfWkOCaywza_eVe-pb_TvQ-LFA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Fri, Sep 25, 2026 at 11:47 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> "David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Friday, September 25, 2026, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
> wrote:
> >> It seems like a correct sentence to me, removing as per your suggestion
> >> would
> >> AFAICT make it grammatically incorrect.
>
> > Probably, but wouldn’t saying “this user” instead of “that user” be
> equally
> > correct without making the word “that” serve two roles in the paragraph
> and
> > produce this annoying double-that construction?
>
> It's perfectly good English as-is, and offhand I don't think using
> "this" would be an improvement. It's been a long time since high
> school English, but I think that "that" is actually more correct;
> in context I'd take "this user" to mean your own operating-system
> user ID, which was mentioned first. Note that the next sentence also
> uses "that user" to refer to the same database user.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

After reading the discussion, it now makes sense the sentence, thanks for
the clarification

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2026-09-25 22:13:10 Re: log_line_prefix and JSON log format
Previous Message Matemática A3K 2026-09-25 16:17:52 Re: [Minor] Improve reading in "2. A Brief History of PostgreSQL"