Re: Nearing beta?

From: Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Nearing beta?
Date: 2013-04-11 16:06:41
Message-ID: CA+CSw_vJiM1cuCjUOiBg3y6YFrSzD61n4AJPt=w3sp5ipeyuew@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> We are nearing April 15 --- are we nearing a time when we can close 9.3
>> development and start focusing on the beta?
>
> It's time to start maintaining the list of open items for 9.3,
> which would help us figure out if we're ready for beta.
>
> The issue with event triggers causing catalog access during START
> TRANSACTION is clearly a "must fix before beta" item. I'm afraid
> that bug #8049 is going to require some nontrivial planner changes
> (more about that in a bit), which means I'd like to get that into
> the beta cycle too. What else are people aware of?

Page checksum algorithm needs to be decided before beta. If we release
an alpha without nailing it down testers need to be warned that
checksums are not likely to be upgradable.

Regards,
Ants Aasma
--
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kohei KaiGai 2013-04-11 16:10:35 Re: [sepgsql 3/3] Add db_procedure:execute permission checks
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2013-04-11 16:00:28 Re: [GSOC] questions about idea "rewrite pg_dump as library"