Re: glibc qsort() vulnerability

From: Mats Kindahl <mats(at)timescale(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: glibc qsort() vulnerability
Date: 2024-02-16 12:45:52
Message-ID: CA+144256aiJqpF9M6+82br97hJLMySFReuXxTc_te3aqsZ=ouA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 12:32 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Here is what I have staged for commit.
>

Looks good to me.

Checked that all of the comparisons are in the expected order, except
inside compDESC, cmp_lsn, and resource_priority_cmp, where the order is
reversed.

Best wishes,
Mats Kindahl

>
> --
> Nathan Bossart
> Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2024-02-16 12:53:00 Re: A proposal to provide a timeout option for CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT/pg_create_logical_replication_slot
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2024-02-16 12:37:16 Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication