From: | John H <johnhyvr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Kwan <justinpkwan(at)outlook(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, vignesh <vignesh(at)cloudflare(dot)com>, vignesh ravichandran <admin(at)viggy28(dot)dev>, "hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi" <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, "jkwan(at)cloudflare(dot)com" <jkwan(at)cloudflare(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Making pg_rewind faster |
Date: | 2025-07-01 18:13:46 |
Message-ID: | CA+-JvFuJo+2G23Xr6QLnEDjL=c_QC=go054L1tAD9MbuuWN8rg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
I've attached an updated version of the patch against master with the changes
suggested.
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 10:03 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 04:08:45PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>
>> There may be something I am missing here, but there is no need to care
>> about segments with a TLI older than lastcommontliIndex, no?
Hard to say. pg_rewind is intended to make the same "copy" of the cluster which
implies pg_wal/ should look the same. There might be use cases around logical
replication where you would want these WAL files to still exist even
across promotions?
>> decide_wal_file_action() assumes that the WAL segment exists on the
>> target and the source. This looks bug-prone to me without at least an
>> assertion.
From previous refactors there is now an Assertion in filemap.c
decide_file_action that handles this.
> Assert(entry->target_exists && entry->source_exists);
decide_wal_file_action is called after the assertion.
Thanks,
--
John Hsu - Amazon Web Services
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0004-Avoid-copying-WAL-segments-before-divergence-to-spee.patch | application/x-patch | 8.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2025-07-01 18:28:24 | Re: Making Row Comparison NULL row member handling more robust during skip scans |
Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2025-07-01 18:04:41 | Re: No error checking when reading from file using zstd in pg_dump |