Re: [PG19] Three bugs with a CHECK constraint that only the child enforces

From: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <nik(at)postgres(dot)ai>
Subject: Re: [PG19] Three bugs with a CHECK constraint that only the child enforces
Date: 2026-10-09 06:05:00
Message-ID: C910AEB4-ACBA-42B8-A1F7-0725E0FF2A46@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Oct 9, 2026, at 12:42, shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi hackers,
>
> I used Opus to analyze the new features in PG19, and it found three
> bugs with a CHECK constraint that a child enforces and its parent
> does not. Each item has a script and a patch with its number.

Forgot to attach the patches?

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Geier 2026-10-09 06:11:17 Re: [PROPOSAL] Expand OR clauses in joins to UNION ALL paths
Previous Message Bertrand Drouvot 2026-10-09 06:03:20 Re: Persist slot invalidations before publishing them