Re: [NOVICE] - SAN/NAS/DAS - Need advises

From: Tena Sakai <tsakai(at)gallo(dot)ucsf(dot)edu>
To: Craig James <craig_james(at)emolecules(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] - SAN/NAS/DAS - Need advises
Date: 2010-09-07 20:47:11
Message-ID: C8ABF2DF.C419%tsakai@gallo.ucsf.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Hi everybody,

I have been reading this thread and I got the idea that
SANs to avoid, but would somebody please give a bit of
Comparison/perspective on NAS?

Regards,

Tena Sakai
tsakai(at)gallo(dot)ucsf(dot)edu

On 9/7/10 12:36 PM, "Craig James" <craig_james(at)emolecules(dot)com> wrote:

> On 9/7/10 12:06 PM, Jesper Krogh wrote:
>> On 2010-09-07 20:42, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>>> With the right supplier, you can plug in literally 100 hard drives to
>>> a regular server with DAS and for a fraction of the cost of a SAN.
>> Ok, recently I have compared prices a NexSan SASBeast with 42 15K SAS drives
>> with a HP MDS600 with 15K SAS drives.
>>
>> The first is 8gbit Fibre Channel, the last is 3Gbit DAS SAS. The
>> fibre channel version is about 20% more expensive pr TB.
>>
>> So of course it is a "fraction of the cost of a SAN", but it is a
>> fairly small one.
>
> Are you really comparing equal systems? "8gbit Fibre Channel" means a single
> Fibre Channel shared by 42 disks, whereas "3GBit DAS SAS" means 42 3gbit
> channels running in parallel. It seems like you'd really need some realistic
> benchmarks that emulate your actual server load before you'd know how these
> two systems compare.
>
> Craig
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2010-09-07 20:47:55 Re: [NOVICE] - SAN/NAS/DAS - Need advises
Previous Message Craig James 2010-09-07 19:36:18 Re: [NOVICE] - SAN/NAS/DAS - Need advises