| From: | Guido Neitzer <lists(at)event-s(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jim C(dot) Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: shared_buffers > 284263 on OS X |
| Date: | 2006-11-27 07:04:59 |
| Message-ID: | C79863B3-8DE9-47DD-85DD-3FA45B47A1AF@event-s.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Am 27.11.2006 um 00:25 schrieb Jim C. Nasby:
> Got any data about that you can share? People have been wondering
> about
> cases where drastically increasing shared_buffers makes a difference.
I have tried to compile PostgreSQL as a 64Bit application on my G5
but wasn't successful. But I must admit, that I'm not a C programmer
at all. I know enough to work with source packages and configure /
make but not enough to work with the errors I got from the compile.
And as I'm extremely busy right now, I can't follow the trail and
learn more about it.
Perhaps someone with more knowledge can take a look at it.
cug
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brian Wipf | 2006-11-27 07:23:47 | Re: shared_buffers > 284263 on OS X |
| Previous Message | Guido Neitzer | 2006-11-27 07:04:38 | Re: shared_buffers > 284263 on OS X |