| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org,Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Reorder EPQ work, to fix rowmark related bugs and improve effici |
| Date: | 2019-09-09 21:55:56 |
| Message-ID: | C7955344-A83A-442F-8CE8-EFBEB5E024B1@anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Hi,
On September 9, 2019 10:51:26 PM GMT+01:00, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 12:32 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
>wrote:
>> Reorder EPQ work, to fix rowmark related bugs and improve efficiency.
>
>Did this cause the following failure in eval-plan-qual on
>REL_12_STABLE?
>
>https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=prairiedog&dt=2019-09-09%2019%3A08%3A41
Argh, yes, probably. But it's just isolationtester I think, not a backed bug. Need to backport the recent fix in master to at least 12.
Tom, do you think we should backpatch both the order fix and the notice improvement, or just the former? And to which version?
Andres
Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-09-09 22:01:28 | Re: pgsql: Reorder EPQ work, to fix rowmark related bugs and improve effici |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2019-09-09 21:51:26 | Re: pgsql: Reorder EPQ work, to fix rowmark related bugs and improve effici |