From: | Tena Sakai <tsakai(at)gallo(dot)ucsf(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Failed to restore/recreate database (one more piece of info) |
Date: | 2009-11-17 06:57:41 |
Message-ID: | C7278965.8BCC%tsakai@gallo.ucsf.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Hi Tom,
Many thanks for your assistance.
I am on my way. Here's what I am doing:
dropdb musket
createdb musket
pg_dump canon > canon.dump
psql -d musket -f canon.dump
I am on the 4th step. But I could achieve the same with:
dropdb musket
createdb musket
pg_dump canon | psql -d musket -f -
can't I? Aside from styling, there is no functional difference
between two procedures, is there?
Thank you.
Regards,
Tena Sakai
tsakai(at)gallo(dot)ucsf(dot)edu
On 11/16/09 10:42 AM, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
Tena Sakai <tsakai(at)gallo(dot)ucsf(dot)edu> writes:
> Now that I am thinking, maybe the file made by pg_dumpall has
> "canon" encoded and therefore what I did logically did not copy
> any canon tables into musket? Could this be the case?
Yup, exactly. It would have created canon and restored into that.
> If so, how would I duplicate an existing database and call it
> with a different name?
Use pg_dump not pg_dumpall.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2009-11-17 17:25:09 | Re: Failed to restore/recreate database (one more piece of info) |
Previous Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2009-11-17 04:14:29 | Re: Differences in installing Postgres 8.3.8 |