From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: should we enable log_checkpoints out of the box? |
Date: | 2021-11-02 11:00:15 |
Message-ID: | C69EBE8E-A4F0-4B42-A2E7-0DE74CA2EF58@yesql.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 1 Nov 2021, at 14:02, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> There is still some data that log_checkpoint gives you that the statistics don't -- but maybe we should instead look at exposing that information in pg_stat_bgwriter, rather than changing the default.
I don't have strong opinions on changing the default, but +1 on at
investigating exposing the information in the view for monitoring.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2021-11-02 11:10:39 | Re: Error "initial slot snapshot too large" in create replication slot |
Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2021-11-02 10:57:18 | Re: Extension ownership and misuse of SET ROLE/SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION |