Re: How would I find the WWW project?

From: "A(dot)M(dot)" <agentm(at)themactionfaction(dot)com>
To: pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How would I find the WWW project?
Date: 2010-09-13 15:43:43
Message-ID: C60BCBE9-6B21-4E1E-A71B-5647FE8C6C27@themactionfaction.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www


On Sep 13, 2010, at 5:08 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:01, Raymond O'Donnell <rod(at)iol(dot)ie> wrote:
>> On 13/09/2010 06:45, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>>> Not completely obscure but certainly not linked (AFAIK)...
>>>
>>> pgweb.postgresql.org
>>
>> I just tried connecting, and Firefox reports an out-of-date certificate - is
>> that part of the obscurity? :-)
>
> It's supposed to be moved elsewhere.. Short-term to a different
> machine (short term being it should've been done at least half a year
> go, and is mostly JD's fault). Long-term it goes into git (long term
> being it should've been done a year ago, and is mostly my fault :D)

Hm- I have been trying for the past several days to checkout pgweb and the connection always gets "truncated" at various locations.

> svn co https://pgweb.postgresql.org/svn/trunk pgweb
<snip>
A pgweb/portal/files/documentation/pdf/8.3/index.html
A pgweb/portal/files/documentation/pdf/8.4
A pgweb/portal/files/documentation/pdf/8.4/postgresql-8.4.4-A4.pdf
svn: REPORT of '/svn/!svn/vcc/default': Could not read response body: Secure connection truncated (https://pgweb.postgresql.org)
> svn --version
svn, version 1.6.5 (r38866)
compiled Oct 16 2009, 02:54:10

Also, I was surfing around trac on pgweb and got a python backtrace claiming it couldn't allocate 48 bytes. Are there memory problems on the machine or am I doing something wrong here?

Cheers,
M

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-09-13 15:48:22 Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2010-09-13 14:18:45 Re: [DOCS] Doc fixes and improvements