Re: weaknesses and strenghts of PG

Thomas

PostgreSQL is the only database supported by once:radix
(www.oncetechnologies.com)

While it doesn't directly affect the performance of the database, it is
certainly a consideration for people who want a rapid application
development environment for building and deploying sophisticated web-based
commercial applications without all the specialist skills that comparable
applications need.

We have systems that have replaced conventional client-server applications
spanning continents with thousands of transactions being processed each day.

Is that relevant to your comparison?

Regards

Rob Napier

On 7/2/09 9:05 PM, "Thomas Finneid" <tfinneid(at)fcon(dot)no> wrote:

>
> I am researching an advocation paper on Postgres. Basically I would like
> to make a list of the most important strengths and weaknesses of
> Postgres compared to a couple of other major databases.
>
> The aim is to have a factual technical background for when advocating
> Postgres to potential users.
>
> Specifically I would like to compare:
>
> - PG
> - MySql
> - Oracle
> - MS SQL server
> - Firebird
>
> the facts I am looking for is about the core functionality and
> application use aspects, while
>
> the answers I am looking for, is for example whether
> - one db more or less suited for GIS or warehouse or ...
> - one db is not well suited for performance operations
> - if there are types of operations a database is not good at,
> or conversely, is extremely good at.
>
> No DB can be the best on all application types, so my focus is on
> figuring out where PG is better than other DBs, where it is not and
> where it is evenly matched.
>
> regards
>
> thomas