From: | "Snyder, Hal" <hal_snyder(at)sdsi(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | snapshot docs |
Date: | 1999-01-06 17:26:09 |
Message-ID: | C5A775792A33D2118EE900A0C9AB246C0CE0D8@postman.lombard |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Having at least two sets of docs - current, and latest release - on the
web site is definitely a good idea.
I'd like to rearrange the developer's area on the web site a little,
will get back to this list with the results in a day or so.
Something like <DocumentRoot>/docs/dev would make sense for housing docs
in progress - the exact location of the directory tree doesn't much matter
as long as it's accessible to the PostgreSQL virtual host and uses relative
links internally.
Hal
----- Forwarded message from "Thomas G. Lockhart"
<lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> -----
...
btw, this brings up a question: if we generate snapshot docs on a, say,
daily basis and post them on the web site should that be in a different
place than where they are posted currently? There should probably be a
stable set of docs from the last release and then a different place for
docs related to the current development tree.
What do you think Hal? Where should development or snapshot docs go??
----- End forwarded message -----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hal Snyder | 1999-01-07 09:34:02 | Upcoming Attractions, web site |
Previous Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1999-01-06 17:20:28 | Re: Postgresql INSTALL-file & Windows |