Re: nbtree: Cache operator family OID in _bt_setup_array_cmp

From: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: nbtree: Cache operator family OID in _bt_setup_array_cmp
Date: 2025-12-31 10:13:57
Message-ID: C56D9110-F313-4627-8962-D566D998323C@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Dec 31, 2025, at 18:04, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 31 Dec 2025 at 13:16, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Hackers,
>>
>> While reviewing a separate patch related to nbtree, I noticed that _bt_setup_array_cmp in nbtpreprocesskeys.c performs multiple redundant lookups of the operator family OID via rel->rd_opfamily[skey->sk_attno - 1].
>>
>> The attached patch caches this value in a local opfamily variable. This matches the pattern used in several other functions within the same file (such as _bt_skiparray_strat_decrement, _bt_preprocess_array_keys, etc.), making the code more consistent and readable.
>>
>> The assignment is placed after the early-return check for (elemtype == opcintype) to ensure we only perform the array indexing when the cross-type comparison logic is actually reached.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> --
>> Chao Li (Evan)
>> HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
>> https://www.highgo.com/
>>
>
>
> Hi!
> We do not cache anything here, this is just a refactoring for nbtree internals?
>

Yes, just cache rel->rd_opfamily[skey->sk_attno - 1] into a local variable.

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yugo Nagata 2025-12-31 10:21:24 Re: Add a berief general comment on BTScanInsertData's nextkey and backward
Previous Message Kirill Reshke 2025-12-31 10:04:28 Re: nbtree: Cache operator family OID in _bt_setup_array_cmp