| From: | Tore Halset <halset(at)pvv(dot)ntnu(dot)no> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: dell versus hp |
| Date: | 2007-11-06 14:14:19 |
| Message-ID: | C556D8F1-326A-4CAD-9ECA-20006D0C6C05@pvv.ntnu.no |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Nov 6, 2007, at 12:53 , Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Le mardi 06 novembre 2007, Tore Halset a écrit :
>> 1) Dell 2900 (5U)
>> 8 * 146 GB SAS 15Krpm 3,5"
>> 8GB ram
>> Perc 5/i. battery backup. 256MB ram.
>> 2 * 4 Xeon 2,66GHz
>
> In fact you can add 2 hot-plug disks on this setup, connected to the
> frontpane. We've bought this very same model with 10 15 rpm disks
> some weeks
> ago, and it reached production last week.
>
> So we have 2 OS raid1 disk (with /var/backups and /var/log ---
> pg_log), 2
> raid1 disk for WAL and 6 disks in a RAID10, the 3 raids managed by the
> included Perc raid controller. So far so good!
Interesting. Do you have any benchmarking numbers? Did you test with
software raid 10 as well?
Regards,
- Tore.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tore Halset | 2007-11-06 14:15:39 | Re: dell versus hp |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2007-11-06 13:48:31 | Re: dell versus hp |