Re: UNION and bad performance

From: "Marc Mamin" <M(dot)Mamin(at)intershop(dot)de>
To: "Olivier Pala" <olivier(dot)pala(at)xgs-france(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: UNION and bad performance
Date: 2010-12-11 10:27:59
Message-ID: C4DAC901169B624F933534A26ED7DF31034BB99A@JENMAIL01.ad.intershop.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hello,

UNION will remove all duplicates, so that the result additionally
requires to be sorted.

Anyway, for performance issues, you should always start investigation
with explain analyze .

regards,

Marc Mamin

From: pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Olivier
Pala
Sent: Donnerstag, 9. Dezember 2010 11:52
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Olivier Pala
Subject: [PERFORM] UNION and bad performance

Hi,

I have a performance trouble with UNION query

First I have this view :

SELECT a,b,c FROM table1, table2 WHERE jointure AND condition

Result : 150 000 records in 1~2 s

Then, I adding an UNION into the same view :

SELECT a,b,c FROM table1, table2 WHERE jointure AND condition
UNION
SELECT a,b,c FROM table3

Result : 150 200 records in 6~7 s

Why, do I have bad performance only for 200 adding records ?

Thanks

SGBD : Postgres 8.3 et 8.4

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Kretschmer 2010-12-11 13:45:47 Re: UNION and bad performance
Previous Message Greg Smith 2010-12-11 09:18:12 Re: Hardware recommendations