Re: clustering without locking

From: Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)killerbytes(dot)com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: clustering without locking
Date: 2008-05-02 14:29:28
Message-ID: C4408168.968A1%scott_ribe@killerbytes.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> Wouldn't new / updated tuples just get put in the hole, fairly rapidly
> un-clustering the table again?

How is that different than putting them in newly-allocated space at the end
of the table?

--
Scott Ribe
scott_ribe(at)killerbytes(dot)com
http://www.killerbytes.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Volkan YAZICI 2008-05-02 14:46:53 Swap Space and vm.oom_kill_allocating_task
Previous Message tekwiz 2008-05-02 14:25:12 Executing dynamic procedure call