Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance

From: Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)killerbytes(dot)com>
To: Craig White <craigwhite(at)azapple(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance
Date: 2007-11-13 16:02:59
Message-ID: C35F18C3.8597B%scott_ribe@killerbytes.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> my understanding was that the lack of threading on OSX made it
> especially poor for a DB server

What you're referring to must be that the kernel was essentially
single-threaded, with a single "kernel-funnel" lock. (Because the OS
certainly supported threads, and it was certainly possible to write
highly-threaded applications, and I don't know of any performance problems
with threaded applications.)

This has been getting progressively better, with each release adding more
in-kernel concurrency. Which means that 10.5 probably obsoletes all prior
postgres benchmarks on OS X.

--
Scott Ribe
scott_ribe(at)killerbytes(dot)com
http://www.killerbytes.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-11-13 16:28:49 Re: (Never?) Kill Postmaster?
Previous Message Vivek Khera 2007-11-13 15:56:21 Re: FreeBSD portupgrade of 8.1 -> 8.2