Re: random_page_costs - are defaults of 4.0 realistic for SCSI RAID 1

From: "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
To: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: random_page_costs - are defaults of 4.0 realistic for SCSI RAID 1
Date: 2007-09-10 22:46:56
Message-ID: C30B1770.4236D%llonergan@greenplum.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi Josh,

On 9/10/07 2:26 PM, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:

> So, when is this getting contributed? ;-)

Yes, that's the right question to ask :-)

One feeble answer: "when we're not overwhelmed by customer activity"...

- Luke

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig James 2007-09-11 04:12:10 What to vacuum after deleting lots of tables
Previous Message Luke Lonergan 2007-09-10 22:45:26 Re: random_page_costs - are defaults of 4.0 realistic for SCSI RAID 1