Re: Add missing period to HINT messages

> On Apr 14, 2026, at 08:39, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 4:28 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 6:32 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 11:10 PM Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2026 at 9:05 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2026 at 1:34 PM Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am not sure if your scope includes contrib/, if yes, I am sure you will find some occurrences there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Updated one more message found in contrib.
>>>>>
>>>>> PSA v2.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> +1 to the general idea here, although at the risk of looking at
>>>> patches before the morning coffee has settled in, ISTM you might have
>>>> missed some entries? And/or this patch isn't against HEAD? For
>>>> example, you seem to be catching the line here
>>>> https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blame/009ea1b08d7b8843435bd0f1137fa3df09aac79f/src/test/regress/expected/partition_split.out#L60,
>>>> but not the one on line 52, maybe because it looks like a comment (but
>>>> istm we should clean these all up. no?)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for your review!
>>>
>>> Yes, the patch applies to HEAD. It looks like I was a bit slack in
>>> updating some test comments. Hopefully, I have found them all now.
>>>
>>
>> BTW, I find such a code cleanup exercise can be done even after
>> feature freeze. If so, shall we do it as a HEAD-only patch or do it in
>> bank branches as well?
>>
>
> I don't have a strong opinion on it, but I think generally that clean
> up patches (where we aren't fixing some kind of document mistake or
> misleading information) generally just go into HEAD for the next
> release, though if it easily applies cleanly to back branches and you
> want to do it, it's probably ok to apply it backwards, but I wouldn't
> spend any time on it if it didn't.
>
> Robert Treat
> https://xzilla.net

I don’t see a branch for 19 is cut out, so is HEAD still 19 today?

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/