Hi All,
On 5/31/07 12:40 AM, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> BTW, we've been talking about the "L2 cache effect" but we don't really
> know for sure if the effect has anything to do with the L2 cache. But
> whatever it is, it's real.
The mailing list archives contain the ample evidence of:
- it's definitely an L2 cache effect
- on fast I/O hardware tests show large benefits of keeping the ring in L2
I see no reason to re-open the discussion about these, can we accept these
as fact and continue?
- Luke