From: | "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Albert Cervera Areny" <albert(at)sedifa(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Bad RAID1 read performance |
Date: | 2007-05-30 14:09:02 |
Message-ID: | C282D38E.31B6B%llonergan@greenplum.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
This sounds like a bad RAID controller - are you using a built-in hardware
RAID? If so, you will likely want to use Linux software RAID instead.
Also - you might want to try a 512KB readahead - I've found that is optimal
for RAID1 on some RAID controllers.
- Luke
On 5/30/07 2:35 AM, "Albert Cervera Areny" <albert(at)sedifa(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
> after doing the "dd" tests for a server we have at work I obtained:
> Read: 47.20 Mb/s
> Write: 39.82 Mb/s
> Some days ago read performance was around 20Mb/s due to no readahead in md0
> so I modified it using hdparm. However, it seems to me that being it a RAID1
> read speed could be much better. These are SATA disks with 3Gb of RAM so I
> did 'time bash -c "dd if=/dev/zero of=bigfile bs=8k count=786432 && sync"'.
> File system is ext3 (if read many times in the list that XFS is faster), but
> I don't want to change the file system right now. Modifing the readahead from
> the current 1024k to 2048k doesn't make any difference. Are there any other
> tweaks I can make?
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2007-05-30 14:11:04 | Re: Vacuum takes forever |
Previous Message | Luke Lonergan | 2007-05-30 14:06:54 | Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives |