From: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Joseph Adams <joeyadams3(dot)14159(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Another swing at JSON |
Date: | 2011-06-17 06:29:58 |
Message-ID: | C2561666B8D59FAC3E6B1379@apophis.local |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
--On 16. Juni 2011 17:38:07 -0400 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> After reading Joseph's comment upthread, I don't see any consensus
>> wether the existing pre-9.1 support is required or even desired. Maybe
>> i missed it, but do we really expect an extension (or contrib module)
>> to be backwards compatible to earlier major releases, when shipped in
>> contrib/ ?
>
> No, we don't. You won't find any attempt in any contrib module to build
> against prior releases. There's not much point, since they're shipped
> with a specific release of the core.
Okay, then we should remove this code. It doesn't do any complicated, but it
seems a waste of code in this case (and from a maintenance point of view).
Joseph, are you able to remove the compatibility code for this CF?
--
Thanks
Bernd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hitoshi Harada | 2011-06-17 07:54:06 | Re: Parameterized aggregate subquery (was: Pull up aggregate subquery) |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-06-17 05:39:53 | Re: procpid? |