| From: | "Dorochevsky,Michel" <michel(dot)dorochevsky(at)softcon(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #3245: PANIC: failed to re-find shared loc k ob je ct |
| Date: | 2007-04-23 14:28:03 |
| Message-ID: | C12B71B21705A04C9B9C3E9300430CAFA970EA@jupiter.softcon-its.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
> Von: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> So, which of your tables has OID 417227? Easiest way to check is
> select 417227::regclass
>
Tom,
Currently a table with name
requireditemtypes_mill7b7c7621
has the object id 417227.
I did restart the DB server in the meantime several times.
I assume that will not change OIDs of existing tables.
I am not 100 percent sure whether I dropped and recreated all tables in the
meantime. Would dropping and recreating the tables reuse old OIDs that
became free? If so the OID might got assigned to another table.
I certainly did not drop the schema in the meantime.
Shall we send you the database?
Best Regards
-- Michel
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-23 14:42:42 | Re: BUG #3245: PANIC: failed to re-find shared loc k ob je ct |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-23 14:11:53 | Re: BUG #3245: PANIC: failed to re-find shared loc k ob je ct |