Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Zdenek Kotala" <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0
Date: 2008-07-06 00:46:52
Message-ID: C10A2A69-B77E-4B82-B9D7-338330045E70@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jul 5, 2008, at 02:58, Gregory Stark wrote:

>> do I need to worry about memory leaks in citext_eq, citext_ne,
>> citext_gt,
>> etc.,
>
> yes

Thanks.

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2008-07-06 00:47:11 Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2008-07-06 00:46:39 Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0