Re: On-disk bitmap index patch

From: "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, "Jie Zhang" <jzhang(at)greenplum(dot)com>, "Mark Kirkwood" <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Gavin Sherry" <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: On-disk bitmap index patch
Date: 2006-07-29 16:43:21
Message-ID: C0F0DE39.2B3BA%llonergan@greenplum.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce,

On 7/29/06 6:31 AM, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> Right. People need a patch to test on their workloads, and analysis can
> be done after feature freeze.

Fair enough.

- Luke

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-07-29 17:15:18 Re: [HACKERS] putting CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-07-29 16:25:39 Re: Formulating an sql query with CTID