Re: Bitmap index AM

From: "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Victor Yegorov" <viy(at)mits(dot)lv>, "Jie Zhang" <jzhang(at)greenplum(dot)com>, "John Eshleman" <jeshleman(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Cc: "Postgres Patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bitmap index AM
Date: 2006-06-12 17:11:07
Message-ID: C0B2EE3B.26E76%llonergan@greenplum.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce,

We have a bitmap index AM in Bizgres (on PG 8.1.3) that is functional and
achieves very worthwhile (10x+) performance and space objectives.

It is a large patch, and introduces the access method along with modifying
the appropriate executor nodes. The latter part was necessary because of
the need to bypass the in-memory bitmap index when an on-disk bitmap is
available.

Because this patch is large, how do you suggest we go through review? Also,
there is some further work that Jie is doing to support efficient
multi-column indexes that will simplify the code, so we're not quite ready
for patch submission.

- Luke

On 6/12/06 9:13 AM, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Victor Yegorov wrote:
>> Hi again.
>>
>> Here's an updated patch, that fixes several bugs and is synced with HEAD.
>
> Are you closer to submitting this patch for application?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2006-06-12 19:01:48 Re: ADD/DROP INHERITS
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-06-12 16:45:04 Re: fori stmt with by keyword was:(Re: [HACKERS] for statement,