Re: Running on an NFS Mounted Directory

From: Ketema Harris <ketema(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
Cc: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Running on an NFS Mounted Directory
Date: 2006-04-27 13:06:48
Message-ID: C0763A28.2CF1%ketema@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Yes, your right, I meant not have to do the backups from the db server
itself. I can do that within the storage device now, by allocating space
for it, and letting the device copy the data files on some periodic basis.

On 4/27/06 9:05 AM, "Bruno Wolff III" <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 08:57:51 -0400,
> Ketema Harris <ketema(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> performance from the db. I also would hopefully then not have to do
>> periodic backups from the db server to some other type of storage. Is this
>> not a good idea? How bad of a performance hit are we talking about? Also,
>
> You always need to do backups if you care about your data. What if someone
> accidental deletes a lot of data? What if someone blows up your data
> center (or there is a flood)?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Wampler 2006-04-27 13:09:50 Re: Running on an NFS Mounted Directory
Previous Message Bruno Wolff III 2006-04-27 13:05:55 Re: Running on an NFS Mounted Directory