Re: [Bizgres-general] Introducing a new linux

From: "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, "Steve Poe" <steve(dot)poe(at)gmail(dot)com>, "bizgres-general" <bizgres-general(at)pgfoundry(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Wu Fengguang" <wfg(at)mail(dot)ustc(dot)edu(dot)cn>
Subject: Re: [Bizgres-general] Introducing a new linux
Date: 2006-04-26 23:33:40
Message-ID: C0755164.22562%llonergan@greenplum.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Jim,

I¹m thinking about it, we¹re already using a fixed read-ahead of 16MB using
blockdev on the stock Redhat 2.6.9 kernel, it would be nice to not have to
set this so we may try it.

- Luke

On 4/26/06 3:28 PM, "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> wrote:

> (including bizgres-general)
>
> Has anyone done any testing on bizgres? It's got some patches that
> eliminate a lot of IO bottlenecks, so it might present even larger
> gains.
>
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 03:08:59PM -0500, Steve Poe wrote:
>> > I found an average 14% improvement Using Pg 7.4.11 with odbc-bench as my
>> > test bed with Wu's kernel patch. I have not tried version 8.x yet.
>> >
>> > Thanks Wu.
>> >
>> > Steve Poe
>> >
>> > Using Postgresql 7.4.11, on an dual Opteron with 4GB
>> >
>> > On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 09:38 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
>>> > > Greetings,
>>> > >
>>> > > I'd like to introduce a new readahead framework for the linux kernel:
>>> > > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0603.2/1021.html
>>> > >
>>> > > HOW IT WORKS
>>> > >
>>> > > In adaptive readahead, the context based method may be of particular
>>> > > interest to postgresql users. It works by peeking into the file cache
>>> > > and check if there are any history pages present or accessed. In this
>>> > > way it can detect almost all forms of sequential / semi-sequential read
>>> > > patterns, e.g.
>>> > > - parallel / interleaved sequential scans on one file
>>> > > - sequential reads across file open/close
>>> > > - mixed sequential / random accesses
>>> > > - sparse / skimming sequential read
>>> > >
>>> > > It also have methods to detect some less common cases:
>>> > > - reading backward
>>> > > - seeking all over reading N pages
>>> > >
>>> > > WAYS TO BENEFIT FROM IT
>>> > >
>>> > > As we know, postgresql relies on the kernel to do proper readahead.
>>> > > The adaptive readahead might help performance in the following cases:
>>> > > - concurrent sequential scans
>>> > > - sequential scan on a fragmented table
>>> > > (some DBs suffer from this problem, not sure for pgsql)
>>> > > - index scan with clustered matches
>>> > > - index scan on majority rows (in case the planner goes wrong)
>>> > >
>>> > > TUNABLE PARAMETERS
>>> > >
>>> > > There are two parameters which are described in this email:
>>> > > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0603.2/1024.html
>>> > >
>>> > > Here are the more oriented guidelines for postgresql users:
>>> > >
>>> > > - /proc/sys/vm/readahead_ratio
>>> > > Since most DB servers are bounty of memory, the danger of readahead
>>> > > thrashing is near to zero. In this case, you can set readahead_ratio to
>>> > > 100(or even 200:), which helps the readahead window to scale up rapidly.
>>> > >
>>> > > - /proc/sys/vm/readahead_hit_rate
>>> > > Sparse sequential reads are read patterns like {0, 2, 4, 5, 8, 11, ...}.
>>> > > In this case we might prefer to do readahead to get good I/O performance
>>> > > with the overhead of some useless pages. But if you prefer not to do so,
>>> > > set readahead_hit_rate to 1 will disable this feature.
>>> > >
>>> > > - /sys/block/sd<X>/queue/read_ahead_kb
>>> > > Set it to a large value(e.g. 4096) as you used to do.
>>> > > RAID users might want to use a bigger number.
>>> > >
>>> > > TRYING IT OUT
>>> > >
>>> > > The latest patch for stable kernels can be downloaded here:
>>> > > http://www.vanheusden.com/ara/
>>> > >
>>> > > Before compiling, make sure that the following options are enabled:
>>> > > Processor type and features -> Adaptive file readahead
>>> > > Processor type and features -> Readahead debug and accounting
>>> > >
>>> > > HELPING AND CONTRIBUTING
>>> > >
>>> > > The patch is open to fine-tuning advices :)
>>> > > Comments and benchmarking results are highly appreciated.
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks,
>>> > > Wu
>>> > >
>>> > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>>> > > TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>>> > >
>>> > > http://archives.postgresql.org
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> > TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>> >
>> > http://archives.postgresql.org
>> >
>
> --
> Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
> Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
> vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
> _______________________________________________
> Bizgres-general mailing list
> Bizgres-general(at)pgfoundry(dot)org
> http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/bizgres-general
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stef T 2006-04-26 23:43:41 Re: Slow deletes in 8.1 when FKs are involved
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-04-26 23:02:34 Re: [PERFORM] WAL logging of SELECT ... INTO command