Re: Mirroring PostgreSQL related content

From: Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)007Marketing(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Mailing lists <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Mirroring PostgreSQL related content
Date: 2006-04-23 04:56:24
Message-ID: C0713F10.3F9CE%pgsql@007Marketing.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 23/4/2006 4:05, "Bruno Wolff III" <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 15:51:35 -0500,
> "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> wrote:
>> Yeah, just to clarify we should only mirror content in the event that
>> the original site goes down. We should absolutely send traffic to the
>> people who are working hard to create the content in the first place, I
>> just hate 'losing knowledge' when someone loses interest and their site
>> goes *poof*.
>
> The Wayback Machine might help get back some of the articles that have
> already disappeared.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

Maybe someone/a few people can mirror these articles at home and in the
event the article gets removed we can upload the mirrored copy.

Has anyone thought of searching for the missing article pages in google and
getting the cached pages from there?

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-04-24 04:21:31 Re: PostgreSQL committer history?
Previous Message Harry E. Clarke 2006-04-22 20:34:03 BUG #2403: Date arithemtic using INTERVAL in UPDATE command does not work