From: | Steve Brett <SBrett(at)e-mis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Christian Lübeck <c(dot)luebeck(at)gmx(dot)de>, "Pgsql-General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: References for PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2002-07-19 12:30:41 |
Message-ID: | C05E7DA1218ED411BF8A00105AC95A8E05C05A9B@sv-cntrmail.emis.local |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Why would you need other companies to use it if it suits your needs ?
I would have thought the features and benefits would drive the decision.
?
Steve
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christian Lübeck [mailto:c(dot)luebeck(at)gmx(dot)de]
> Sent: 18 July 2002 18:54
> To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [GENERAL] References for PostgreSQL
>
>
> Hi!
>
> Just one questions:
>
> Our Company is searching for a good SQL-Database, which will
> be using very
> extensivly in the future.
> PostgreSQL really looks good (low/no cost/ many features), but do big
> companys have this product also on their production servers?
> Any if yes,
> which companys?
>
> Thanks for help,
>
> Christian Lübeck
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andy Marden | 2002-07-19 12:31:52 | Long update progress |
Previous Message | Wim | 2002-07-19 12:17:46 | pg_dumpall failed! |