Re: Did this work in earlier version of Postgres?

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Did this work in earlier version of Postgres?
Date: 2006-03-24 09:03:04
Message-ID: C0496648.88A7%dpage@vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 23/3/06 23:43, "Tony Caduto" <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com> wrote:

> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> There has never been a type named double in PostgreSQL. The type name
>> mandated by the SQL standard is double precision, and PostgreSQL
>> supports that.
>>
>>
> Ok, Thanks for clearing that up for me :-)
>
> Maybe it was pgAdmin that did the substitution.

Nope, must have been you. Why would you have been using pgAdmin anyway? :-p

Regards, Dave

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-03-24 09:50:35 Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2006-03-24 07:33:05 Re: Worthwhile optimisation of position()?