Re: docs: note ownership requirement for refreshing materialized views

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, dian(dot)m(dot)fay(at)gmail(dot)com, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: docs: note ownership requirement for refreshing materialized views
Date: 2018-08-17 21:12:42
Message-ID: C0164524-4A30-4421-A85A-0C403243847B@excoventures.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> On Aug 17, 2018, at 9:21 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> So it seems this patch is being ignored in this thread.
>
> Well, Jonathan did kind of hijack what appears to be a thread about
> documentation (with an already-committed fix).

I apologize if it was interpreted as hijacking, I had brought it up in
my initial reply to Dian, as I’ve seen others do similarly on threads.

> I'd suggest reposting that patch in its own thread and adding it to
> the next CF.

I will go ahead and do this.

Thanks, and thank you for the patch Dian.

Jonathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-08-17 21:20:53 Re: [HACKERS] WIP: long transactions on hot standby feedback replica / proof of concept
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2018-08-17 21:01:58 Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types