| From: | Jimmy Yih <jyih(at)vmware(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Gaurab Dey <gaurabd(at)vmware(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Concurrent deadlock scenario with DROP INDEX on partitioned index |
| Date: | 2022-03-16 20:43:12 |
| Message-ID: | BYAPR05MB6454551BCCF049ADAE65A157BD119@BYAPR05MB6454.namprd05.prod.outlook.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
> For RangeVarCallbackForDropRelation():
>
> + LockRelationOid(indexRelationOid, heap_lockmode);
>
> Since the above is called for both if and else blocks, it can be lifted outside.
Thanks for the feedback. Attached new v3 patch with feedback addressed.
--
Jimmy Yih (VMware)
Gaurab Dey (VMware)
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v3-0001-Fix-concurrent-deadlock-scenario-with-DROP-INDEX-.patch | application/octet-stream | 11.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2022-03-16 20:49:55 | Re: Proposal: Support custom authentication methods using hooks |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2022-03-16 20:36:02 | Re: support for MERGE |