| From: | Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, daveg <daveg(at)sonic(dot)net>, Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>, Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>, Stanislav Lacko <lacko(at)spacesystems(dot)sk>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Is a plan for lmza commpression in pg_dump |
| Date: | 2009-02-08 14:44:24 |
| Message-ID: | BFE84010-9848-4102-8AC3-B48A0EDB3802@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 8 Feb 2009, at 02:49, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Feb 7, 2009, at 4:53 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> we need to add this to the
>> "Features we do not want" section of our todo list.
>
> "Proprietary compression algorithms, even with Postgresql-specific
> license exceptions"?
Now that I would agree about. We would have to explain that we're bsd
licenced *because* we want people to be able to reuse our code outside
postgres including commercial projects
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Chernow | 2009-02-08 14:59:43 | Re: Is a plan for lmza commpression in pg_dump |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2009-02-08 10:29:17 | Re: Is a plan for lmza commpression in pg_dump |