| From: | "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Ron" <rjpeace(at)earthlink(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Michael Stone" <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: What's the best hardver for PostgreSQL 8.1? |
| Date: | 2005-12-27 19:24:17 |
| Message-ID: | BFD6D4E1.19917%llonergan@greenplum.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Bruce,
On 12/27/05 9:51 AM, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Historically, I have heard that RAID5 is only faster than RAID10 if
> there are six or more drives.
Speaking of testing / proof, check this site out:
http://www.wlug.org.nz/HarddiskBenchmarks
I really like the idea - post your bonnie++ results so people can learn from
your configurations.
We've built a performance reporting site, but we can't seem to get it into
shape for release. I'd really like to light a performance leaderboard /
experiences site up somewhere...
- Luke
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron | 2005-12-27 19:57:13 | Re: What's the best hardver for PostgreSQL 8.1? |
| Previous Message | Luke Lonergan | 2005-12-27 19:18:19 | Re: What's the best hardver for PostgreSQL 8.1? |