| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, <gevik(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, <denis(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, <syara(at)greenplum(dot)com>, <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, <paul(dot)oh(at)sun(dot)com>, <andya(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, <sslezak(at)pervasive(dot)com>, <kennisgres-pgdn(at)pgfoundry(dot)org>, <shahzadk(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [Kennisgres-pgdn] RE: Mailing list, Joint PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2005-12-03 21:58:18 |
| Message-ID: | BFB7C57A.6F6B%dpage@vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On 3/12/05 9:45 pm, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> Dave,
>
>> Of course, that doesn't mean that this group cannot decide whether or
>> not to make that proposal.
>
> Right, the proposal would be "www.postgresql.org or kb.postgresql.org".
> Presumably, the WWW group would decide on www.postgresql.org.
Not necessarily - the group has changed a lot since the decision was
originally made. I can only say that I will argue against having a separate
site.
Regards, Dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-12-03 22:53:55 | Potential new quote |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-12-03 21:45:38 | Re: [Kennisgres-pgdn] RE: Mailing list, Joint PostgreSQL Knowledge Base |