Re: Sun supporting PostgreSQL

From: Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)killerbytes(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sun supporting PostgreSQL
Date: 2005-11-19 02:35:58
Message-ID: BFA3DD9E.37C99%scott_ribe@killerbytes.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-announce pgsql-general

>> sponsorship of community members and projects;

This would be good. But frankly, if they never sponsor nor contribute a
single line of code, the fact that *Sun* is now offering paid support for
Postgres is a *huge* boost. From now on, when a company wants to know
whether there are major firms supporting PG, we have a pat answer. (Assuming
of course that Sun sticks with Postgres and their attention doesn't wander
somewhere else. That is one problem with big companies--priorities sometimes
shift.)

--
Scott Ribe
scott_ribe(at)killerbytes(dot)com
http://www.killerbytes.com/
(303) 665-7007 voice

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-11-19 02:54:54 Re: [ANNOUNCE] Sun supporting PostgreSQL
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2005-11-18 23:58:46 Re: Need press list help

Browse pgsql-announce by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-11-19 02:54:54 Re: [ANNOUNCE] Sun supporting PostgreSQL
Previous Message Kyle Bateman 2005-11-18 22:21:37 ERP library goes open-soruce

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guy Rouillier 2005-11-19 02:37:23 Re: Why CALL/PERFORM not part of core SQL?
Previous Message Andreas Seltenreich 2005-11-19 02:30:19 Re: Anomalies with the now() function