Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (

From: "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
To: "Vivek Khera" <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>, "Postgresql Performance" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Date: 2005-11-18 16:20:11
Message-ID: BFA33F3B.1404F%llonergan@greenplum.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Vivek,

On 11/18/05 8:05 AM, "Vivek Khera" <vivek(at)khera(dot)org> wrote:

> I can tell you from direct personal experience that you're just plain
> wrong.
>
> up with my load on a 60+ GB database. The Dual opteron system has

I¹m always surprised by what passes for a large database. The poster is
talking about 5,000GB, or almost 100 times the data you have.

Post your I/O numbers on sequential scan. Sequential scan is critical for
Decision Support / Data Warehousing.

- Luke

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Turner 2005-11-18 16:28:40 Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Previous Message Luke Lonergan 2005-11-18 16:17:48 Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (