| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance |
| Date: | 2005-10-22 09:31:56 |
| Message-ID: | BF7FC59C.3E92%dpage@vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 22/10/05 3:45 am, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> Heads up - I have seen 2 regression hangs. I am checking further. Has
>> anyone else run the regression suite with any version of this patch?
>
> Hm, anyone else? It's pretty hard to see how the patch could break
> the regression tests, because they don't exercise control-C response
> time.
Yeah, I had to kill the buildfarm run on Snake as it was still stuck in make
check after 8 and a bit hours. :-(
Regards, Dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | 7r00l (sent by Nabble.com) | 2005-10-22 09:45:32 | nabble.com |
| Previous Message | Kevin Brown | 2005-10-22 09:24:20 | Re: Question about Ctrl-C and less |