Re: Performance problems on 4/8way Opteron (dualcore)

From: "J(dot) Andrew Rogers" <jrogers(at)neopolitan(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance problems on 4/8way Opteron (dualcore)
Date: 2005-07-31 15:29:15
Message-ID: BF123C5B.868%jrogers@neopolitan.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 7/30/05 12:57 AM, "William Yu" <wyu(at)talisys(dot)com> wrote:
> I haven't investigated the 2.6.12+ kernel updates yet -- I probably will
> do our development servers first to give it a test.

The kernel updates make the NUMA code dual-core aware, which apparently
makes a big difference in some cases but not in others. It makes some
sense, since multi-processor multi-core machines will have two different
types of non-locality instead of just one that need to be managed. Prior to
the v2.6.12 patches, a dual-core dual-proc machine was viewed as a quad-proc
machine.

The closest thing to a supported v2.6.12 kernel that I know of is FC4, which
is not really supported in the enterprise sense of course.

J. Andrew Rogers

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Arbash Meinel 2005-07-31 15:52:14 Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0
Previous Message Dirk Lutzebäck 2005-07-31 10:12:32 Re: Performance problems on 4/8way Opteron (dualcore) HP