| From: | "Alon Goldshuv" <agoldshuv(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: COPY FROM performance improvements |
| Date: | 2005-06-25 22:17:08 |
| Message-ID: | BEE325F4.6163%agoldshuv@greenplum.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
> What about this one:
> case COPY_OLD_FE:
> + ereport(ERROR,
> + (errcode(ERRCODE_CONNECTION_FAILURE),
> + errmsg("Old FE protocal not yet supported in fast COPY processing
> (CopyGetData())")));
> +
>
> This can't stay like it is, can it?
> Who uses the old FE protocol for COPY? Any drivers?
In my message while submitting the patch I indicated that this is the only
thing that will not work, and also wondered what are the use cases of the
old FE protocol... So I am joining you looking for an answer :-)
Alon.
>
> Otherwise I think the speed improvment is very fine. :-)
>
> Best Regards,
> Michael Paesold
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Luke Lonergan | 2005-06-25 22:48:53 | Re: COPY FROM performance improvements |
| Previous Message | Petr Jelínek | 2005-06-25 22:14:49 | Re: limiting connections per user/database |