| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: gram.y=>preproc.y |
| Date: | 2008-11-10 17:38:58 |
| Message-ID: | BDBBCDDD-59E9-4911-AE36-A6D54D001A63@kineticode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Nov 10, 2008, at 8:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> We should probably standardize on the perl version, ugly or not,
> because
> otherwise we'll have a difference in build process between Unix and
> Windows machines. Personally I don't really care how ugly it is as
> long
> as no one has to look at it ;-) ... but if someone wants to beautify
> the
> perl script they're surely welcome to do so.
I'd be happy to, but I haven't really been following this thread. What
does it do, and how do I make sure it continues to work as I refactor
it?
I'm fine to wait until it's committed, too.
>
Best,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2008-11-10 17:59:20 | Re: pgsql: Unite ReadBufferWithFork, ReadBufferWithStrategy, and |
| Previous Message | Brendan Jurd | 2008-11-10 17:37:40 | Re: Patch for ISO-8601-Interval Input and output. |