I'd like to thank you for quick replies and for the thoughtful feedback.
I'm working on improving the current wording and I'm going to follow up shortly with an updated version.
Please, stay tuned.
On Feb 11, 2013, at 12:15 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I'm not sure what others think, but the proposed wording seems a bit
>> hard on plain text dumps to me.
> I wasn't terribly thrilled with labeling pg_dumpall "deprecated",
> either. It might be imperfect for some use cases, but that adjective
> suggests that we're trying to get rid of it, which surely isn't the
> regards, tom lane
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andres Freund||Date: 2013-02-12 11:25:19|
|Subject: Re: Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be
changed via SQL [review]|
|Previous:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2013-02-12 10:27:55|
|Subject: Re: another idea for changing global configuration settings