Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: backup.sgml patch that adds information on custom format backups

From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <iliv(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: backup.sgml patch that adds information on custom format backups
Date: 2013-02-12 11:03:32
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hello everyone!

I'd like to thank you for quick replies and for the thoughtful feedback.

I'm working on improving the current wording and I'm going to follow up shortly with an updated version.

Please, stay tuned.


On Feb 11, 2013, at 12:15 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I'm not sure what others think, but the proposed wording seems a bit
>> hard on plain text dumps to me.
> I wasn't terribly thrilled with labeling pg_dumpall "deprecated",
> either.  It might be imperfect for some use cases, but that adjective
> suggests that we're trying to get rid of it, which surely isn't the
> case.
> 			regards, tom lane
> -- 
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andres FreundDate: 2013-02-12 11:25:19
Subject: Re: Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]
Previous:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2013-02-12 10:27:55
Subject: Re: another idea for changing global configuration settings from SQL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group