Re: backup.sgml patch that adds information on custom format backups

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <iliv(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: backup.sgml patch that adds information on custom format backups
Date: 2013-02-10 22:15:23
Message-ID: 14115.1360534523@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I'm not sure what others think, but the proposed wording seems a bit
> hard on plain text dumps to me.

I wasn't terribly thrilled with labeling pg_dumpall "deprecated",
either. It might be imperfect for some use cases, but that adjective
suggests that we're trying to get rid of it, which surely isn't the
case.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2013-02-10 23:27:49 pgbench --startup option
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2013-02-10 21:47:46 Re: backup.sgml patch that adds information on custom format backups